Windrush: A Day To Remember

Brief Early History of Windrush Generation
The 22nd June marks the 73rd anniversary of the Windrush migration, initiated by the landing of HMT Empire Windrush at Tilbury Docks in Essex. The passengers of the ship included 492 people from the Caribbean who have come to represent the subsequent migration of people from Commonwealth countries to Britain. People who came to the UK from Caribbean countries between 1948 and 1973 would become known as the Windrush generation. Most of them were skilled workers. They came to answer Britain’s need for labour as it reeled from the aftershocks of war. That the majority of them had to settle for a lower job status than their skills justified was just one form of discrimination that would follow. All of these people were British citizens. The 1948 Nationality Act had granted United Kingdom citizenship to citizens of Britain’s colonies and former colonies. Their British passports gave them the right to come to Britain and stay here for the rest of their lives. Furthermore, as a result of the British colonial education system that revered Britain as the ‘mother country’, many would have identified as culturally British. This, however, was not the opinion of Britain’s white population at the time, who subjected members of the Windrush generation to racially charged verbal abuse and physical violence. Furthermore, access to housing, some pubs, clubs, dance halls, and churches were denied to Afro-Caribbean people because of the colour of their skin.
Windrush Scandal – what happened?
Unfortunately, these forms of discrimination only go to provide the context of what would later become known as the Windrush scandal. The anxieties concerning migration had not changed much in a significant portion of British voters in the 2010’s from what they were when Windrush landed in 1948. The platform of the Conservative government became one that aimed to, in the words of Theresa May, then Home Secretary ‘create here in Britain a really hostile environment for illegal migration’. This, although at the time perhaps a fleeting line, acquired huge historical significance. The term ‘hostile environment’ came to embody a policy that tasked the NHS, landlords, banks, employers, and others with enforcing immigration controls. It was the ambition of the Home Office to make it so difficult for the people it saw as illegally residing in the UK to remain that they would voluntarily leave the country, as this was deemed a cost-cutting form of deportation.
‘In a political climate where the rhetoric on immigration had been steadily hardening for a decade, [the Windrush generation] were viewed by officials as acceptable collateral damage. In its haste to implement measures which it hoped would cut stubbornly high net migration figures, the government reclassified a large, wholly legal cohort of long-term residents as illegal immigrants’. – Amelia Gentleman, The Windrush Betrayal
The Windrush scandal began to surface in 2017 when it emerged that hundreds of Commonwealth citizens, many from the Windrush generation, had been wrongly detained, deported, and denied legal rights. Many Black Britons had their lives devastated by Britain’s deeply flawed and discriminatory immigration system. Because many of the Windrush generation arrived as children on their parents’ passports, and the Home Office destroyed thousands of landing cards and other records, many lacked the documentation to prove their right to remain in the UK. The Home Office also placed the burden of proof on individuals to prove their residency predated 1973. The Home Office demanded at least one official document from every year they had lived here. Attempting to find documents from decades ago created a huge, and in many cases, impossible burden on people who had done nothing wrong.
Falsely deemed as ‘illegal immigrants’ / ‘undocumented migrants’ they began to lose their access to housing, healthcare, bank accounts and driving licenses. Many were placed in immigration detention, prevented from travelling abroad and threatened with forcible removal, while others were deported to countries they had not seen since they were children.
Why is this still relevant?
The scars from the Windrush scandal are still being felt today. Although a joint op-ed published by The Home Secretary Priti Patel and Bishop Derek Webley in December last year promised to do everything in their power to right the wrongs suffered, there is still so much more work to be done. One only has to take a quick google of the topic to find that the majority of those victimised by the scandal have still yet to receive compensation, with examples of people who continue to be failed by our institutions emerging practically every day. Startlingly, Anthony Bryan whose BAFTA winning work was inspired by his experience of the scandal has still yet to receive any level of compensation. Some victims are dying without the wrongs they have suffered having been given the recognition that compensation would provide. In marking this day, we not only commemorate the landing of the Windrush but must demand that the victims of the scandal who have yet to be compensation be done so. Active citizenship demands that we hold those people and institutions responsible for the injustices of the Windrush scandal to account.
Further Reading:
Amelia Gentleman, The Windrush Betrayal: Exposing the Hostile Environment (2019)
Peter Fryer, The History of Black People in Britain (1984)
https://www.jcwi.org.uk/windrush-scandal-explained
https://study.soas.ac.uk/on-windrush-day/









